In order to do this we bought seven 2×4’s to get 63 pieces, each one being 10 1/2 inches. For all the times you have a bunch of friends and family over, this DIY Large Jenga Game is SO much fun to play! And it is perfect because it is just as much fun for kids as it is for adults:) Did you play Jenga all the time as a kid growing up? I know I did- I loved it! Well now the game has been taken to a whole new level. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email. Join the discussion on Twitter and on Facebook. We urge the political forces gathering for the Farm Bill to make 2023 the year that Big Sugar finally gets told “No!” Just as sweetly as possible. They might not care, however, if Congress finds new ways to pay off its sugar daddies, at taxpayer expense. Food manufacturers make up a strong constituency, operating in every state, and they’re expected to seek changes to the program that would allow more imports and bring prices down. The leaders of the House and Senate Agriculture committees overseeing the 2023 Farm Bill are thought to be less beholden to the sugar cartel than some of their predecessors, and less caught up in distracting disputes over immigration policy. ![]() More people need to recognize just how much sugar is added to their food, just as more need to know how Big Sugar siphons money from their wallets. We favor clear, easy-to-read disclosures so people can decide for themselves what to consume. That nanny-state approach hasn’t worked in the past and we doubt that similar restrictions would make a positive difference today. ![]() Alas, high prices have prevailed for decades and Americans still consume too much, including in products like yogurt and granola bars thought to be, and often marketed as, “good-for-you.”Įuropean regulators limit the amount of sugar that can be added to processed foods, and in some cases ban products deemed unhealthy. Given that consuming sugar is unhealthy, you might think that keeping the price artificially high has advantages. International Trade Commission.Ĭonsumers would benefit from letting a freer market prevail, and the industry would get more competitive, as it did in Australia, which ended sugar subsidies years ago and still produces huge quantities at world-market prices. The government also buys any “surplus” that might weigh on prices and directs it to another politically favored group: companies that turn sugar into ethanol fuel.Īny effort to change the program is likely to meet with phony objections, as when a modest reform effort five years ago was branded a “sugar farmer bankruptcy bill.” The reality is that allowing imports would result in a 10%-12% cut in domestic cane sugar employment while beet sugar employment would likely increase along with exports, according to a study by the U.S. A “loan” program funnels payments to domestic processors, who can pay back the funds in sugar. sugar program, established in 1981, directs the Agriculture Department to guarantee higher prices for farmers by limiting supplies through production quotas, while restricting and taxing imports. In the process, it has undermined Chicago’s longtime role as a candy-making hub by pushing production abroad.Īs it stands, no one can make a lollipop or gumball on the South Side without indirectly paying off the sugar cartel. So have many other politicians on both sides of the aisle.įor decades, the sugar lobby has splashed out megabuck donations to perpetuate its government-sponsored rip-off. Marco Rubio) who’ve taken six-figure campaign contributions from Big Sugar. Voters are justifiably angry about the high cost of food, and no doubt would support eliminating a hidden tax that assaults bedrock principles of capitalism and fair trade.īut change will only happen over the objections of politicians (like Florida’s GOP Sen. Someday, the price-gouging must stop, and reformers have high hopes for the 2023 Farm Bill - the federal farm and food policy legislation that comes up for renewal every five years. consumers at least $2.4 billion at the grocery store each year. Lining the pockets of this wealthy, politically connected pressure group costs U.S. The main culprits? A small group of domestic sugar processors, sugar cane growers in Florida, Louisiana and Texas, and sugar beet producers in a handful of mostly northern states. As in the days of Soviet central planning, the program benefits a few at the expense of the many. A government farm-subsidy program in effect since the 1930s blocks cheaper imports and controls the price and quantity of sugar in our marketplace. ![]() costs nearly twice as much as elsewhere in the world, raising prices for candy, baked goods, ice cream and more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |